Lahars
General topics
-
Flow characteristics
-
Causes
-
Deposits
-
Flow mechanisms
Mud Flows (Lahars)
-
Slurries of fine and coarse materials
-
Audible from a distance
-
Closely follow topography
-
High range of yield strength
Lahars From Rainfall
-
Pinatubo, 1991
-
Caused by typhoon after eruption
-
Average velocity of 12 ms-1
-
Carried boulders > 1.5 m diameter
-
~ 100 people killed
Lahars From Crater Lakes
-
Kelut, 1919 and 1990, > 5000 people
killed
-
Ruapehu, 1953
-
Some loss of life and property
-
Possible to control by lake size?
Lahars From Snow Melt
-
Nevado del Ruiz, 1985
-
Small eruption
-
6 x 107 m3 of
lahar produced
-
Mud flows traveled > 60 km
-
Average v = 36 ms-1
-
Q = 5 x 104 m3s-1
-
90 minutes following eruption
-
22,000 killed in Armero
Osceola Mudflow, Mt. Rainier
-
V = 3.8 km3
-
Age = 5600 yBP
-
Runout > 120 km
-
Area > 200 km2
-
Velocity at least 20 m/s
-
Qmax = 2.5 * 106
m3/s
-
Bulking of sand and gravel
Classification
-
Debris avalanche
-
Non-cohesive lahar
-
Cohesive lahar
-
Stream flow
Deposits
Flow fronts
Marginal levees
Ogive surface ridges
Unsorted
No bedding
Basal shear layer?
Laminated fine-grained top
Flow Mechanisms
High range in yield strength
Slight density contrast matrix/clasts
Intergranular lubrication
Little clast friction
Shear Strength
k = c + s
tan f
k = shear strength
c = cohesion
s = normal
stress
f = friction
angle
s = (s
- P)
P = pore pressure
Flow Components
Fluid phase
Frictionless mixture water and fine
particles
Responsible for cohesive strength
Granular phase
Coarser particles
Determines frictional strength
Flow Transformations
-
Debris avalanches
-
Debris flows flows
-
Hyperconcentrated flows
-
Stream flows
Hydrograph
Flow characteristics vs. time
Stage height (m)
Discharge
Q (m3/s)
Area under the curve is total volume
Maximum discharge
Duration
Geometric Considerations
-
Source
-
Size and shape
-
volume
-
Deposit
-
Cross sectional area
-
Planimetric area
Source Characteristics
-
General failure body
-
Saucer shaped geometry
-
Terzaghi (1931) slip surface
-
Volume approximation
-
cone formula
-
volume ~ 1/3
p r2h ~ A h/3
Co ulomb-viscosity laws control debris
flows
-
Coulomb (1773) establlished
the modern criteria for slope failure
-
Failure will occur at two intersecting
planes for which:
t = k + s'
tan f
t is the shear stres
k is the cohesion
f is the angle of internal friction
-
In two dimensons, intersecting lines
at 45o- f/2
define the stable zone
-
A plot of t
vs. s
defines the Mohr stress space
-
A Mohr circle passing through s1
and s3
that
lies within the two lines indicates a stable material.
-
If s1
increase to the point where the circle touches the two planes, the material
fails as a Columb plastic (Tersaghi, 1943)
Method of Slices
F = (SSuil)/(SWi
sin aI)
Su = undrained shear
strength
l = length of arc
W = weight of slice
a = slope
angle of slice
Debris flow model LAHARZ
-
Iverson et al. 1999 model
-
Cross sectional area (A)
-
Stream profile
-
Top of deposit/flow
-
Planimetric area (B)
-
Outline of deposit
-
Cumulative volume calculation
-
LAHARZ code
-
GIS method for delineating lahar hazard zones
-
Empirically based on 27 lahar paths on 9 volcanoes
-
Predictive equations based on expected lahar volumes
A = 0.05 V2/3
B = 200 V2/3
-
Typical large lahars in the ~ 1,000 years frequency have volumes of ~108
m3
Lahars of 100-year frequency have volumes > 105 m3.
References:
Iverson, RM, Shilling, SP, and Vallance, JW, 1998, Objective delineation
of lahar-inundation hazard zones, Geological Society of America Bull.,
110:972-984.
Scott, KM, Vallance, JW, and Pringle, PT, 1995, Sedimentology, Behavior,
and Hazards of Debris flows at Mount Rainier, Washington, USGS Professional
Paper 1547, 56 p.